Why prices are moving

Below the 5-yr median

Why are stumpage prices falling right now?

$404/MBF rolling 3-month state sawtimber average through Aug 2026. The average has risen 2 straight months.

Data through Aug 2026 · source last checked Aug 26, 2026 · page revised Aug 26, 2026

Cite
$/MBF
Embed chart
Free to republish with attribution. The chart updates automatically as new data lands.
About this data
Source
Washington DNR, Oregon Department of Forestry, Idaho Department of Lands, Montana DNRC, US Forest Service Region 6 and BLM Western Oregon timber auctions
Series
Green sawtimber, rolling 3-month volume-weighted price, state sales quoted in $/MBF
Basis
Stumpage; $/MBF only — federal $/CCF and per-ton sales never blended
Geography
The Pacific Northwest
Unit
$/MBF
Calculation
Rolling 3 months of completed sales
Last observation
Aug 2026
Update frequency
Event-based; updated as results post

The rolling 3-month state sawtimber price has risen 2 consecutive months, up $46.91/MBF (+13.2%) since Jun 2026. Green sawtimber ran a median +26% over its appraised minimum across the trailing 3 months. Completed sawtimber sales averaged 2.5 bidders over the same stretch. 74 public timber sales completed in the trailing 3 months, 2 of them drawing no bid.

Stumpage prices are not falling right now. The rolling state sawtimber average has risen for 2 straight months and is up $46.91/MBF (+13.2%) since Jun 2026. For the current picture, see Why are stumpage prices rising right now?.

The table tracks the rolling 3-month volume-weighted green sawtimber price across state sales quoted in $/MBF. Federal $/CCF and per-ton sales are never blended in.
PeriodCurrentPriorChange
Month over month$404/MBF$374/MBF+7.9%
Year over year$404/MBF$542/MBF-25.6%
vs 3-yr median$404/MBF$542/MBF-25.6%

Previous weeks

An earlier week

State sawtimber prices averaged $374/MBF over the rolling 3-month period through July, a 44.5% decline from $674/MBF a year earlier. Within the 3-month window, prices shed $55.10/MBF since April. Green sawtimber sustained median 37% premiums over appraised minimum and averaged 2.4 bidders per sale across 92 completed sales; four drew no bid.

An earlier week

State sawtimber stumpage fell to $374 per MBF through July, down $55.46 per MBF (12.9 percent) over three months. Prices rebounded 4.9 percent from the prior month, but year-over-year they are down 44.6 percent. Green material held a median 38 percent premium over minimum across the quarter, with 93 completed sales averaging 2.4 bidders and 4 no-bids.

What makes stumpage prices fall

Stumpage prices fall when the competition thins out. Every auction needs at least two serious bidders to run a premium; the moment mills stop needing wood badly, the same tracts sell at or near their appraised minimums, and the average follows.

Weak lumber markets are the usual leader. When lumber prices sag, on soft housing starts or swollen mill inventories, the margin a mill can bid out of shrinks, and the pullback reaches the auction floor within a few sale cycles. A mill that cannot sell boards profitably does not chase standing timber.

Ample log supply does the rest. Plentiful private timber, good logging weather, or a salvage program flush with volume all let mills fill decks without competing at public auction; fewer bidders per sale shows up first in the bid-intensity reads on the region pages, then in the premiums.

Collapsing premiums are the early warning. When the median premium over minimum on the timber board compresses toward zero, buyers are no longer outbidding each other even where they still buy, and the volume-weighted average usually follows it down.

No-bids are the loud version. A tract that draws no bid at all means no mill could make its minimum work, and a thickening no-bid tracker is the clearest public sign of a buyers' market; agencies typically re-offer those tracts later, sometimes at lower minimums.

Mix can exaggerate the slide. A quiet month whose only sales are lower-value species or salvage-adjacent tracts prints a weak average even in a stable market, which is why this page's call runs on a rolling 3-month volume-weighted average of the monthly results rather than any single month.

The rising twin of this page covers the same factors running the other way.